Insight

North Carolina Municipalities Pass Anti-Discrimination Ordinances

North Carolina Municipalities Pass Anti-Discrimination Ordinances

S. Collins Saint

S. Collins Saint

March 22, 2021 09:12 AM

On Dec. 1, 2020, the provision of North Carolina House Bill 142 that preempted municipalities from passing non-discrimination ordinances expired. Since then, municipalities across North Carolina have passed anti-discrimination ordinances aimed to protect certain groups of people from discrimination in three main areas: employment, housing, and public accommodations. Below is a summary of the ordinances that have been passed between Dec. 1, 2020 and Feb. 17, 2021. Because certain subjects can only be regulated by the North Carolina General Assembly on a broad scale, it is unclear whether, if challenged, any of these local anti-discrimination ordinances will be construed as unconstitutional local acts. If you have questions on any of these ordinances, please contact Sarah Saint or another member of our Labor & Employment team, linked below.

MunicipalityEmploymentHousingPublic AccommodationsEnforcementChapel HillProhibits discrimination by an employer (i.e., any person employing 1+ persons within the town and anyone acting on such a person’s behalf) on the basis of race, ethnicity, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, national ancestry, marital status, familial status, pregnancy, veteran status, religion, religious belief or non-belief, age, and disability.n/a

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, national ancestry, marital status, familial status, pregnancy, veteran status, religion, religious belief or non-belief, age, and disability.

Violators may be subject to an enforcement action brought by the town under G.S. § 160A-175(d) and (e) for an appropriate equitable remedy, including but not limited to a mandatory or prohibitory injunction plus all other remedies available under state or federal law.

CarrboroProhibits discrimination by an employer (i.e., any person employing 1+ persons within the town and anyone acting on such a person’s behalf) on the basis of race, natural hair or hairstyles, ethnicity, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin or ancestry, marital or familial status, pregnancy, veteran status, religious belief or non-belief, age, and disability.n/a

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, natural hair or hairstyles, ethnicity, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin or ancestry, marital or familial status, pregnancy, veteran status, religious belief or non-belief, age, and disability.

Violators are guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor under G.S. § 14-4(a) and will be fined $500.00 for each day discrimination occurs. Violators may also be subject to an enforcement action brought by the town under G.S. § 160A-175(d) and (e) for an appropriate equitable remedy, including but not limited to a mandatory or prohibitory injunction plus all other remedies available under state or federal law.

DurhamProhibits discrimination by an employer (i.e., any person employing 1+ persons within the city and anyone acting on such person’s behalf) on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, familial status, military status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or protected hairstyle.

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, familial status, military status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or protected hairstyle.

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, familial status, military status, sexual orientation, gender identity, and protected hairstyle.

Violators are guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor under G.S. § 14-4(a) and will be fined $500.00 for each day discrimination occurs. Violators may also be subject to an enforcement action brought under G.S. § 160A-175(d) and (e) for an appropriate equitable remedy, including but not limited to a mandatory or prohibitory injunction plus all other remedies available under state or federal law.Greensboro

Prohibits discrimination by an employer, regardless of size, on the basis of color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; sexual orientation, gender expression, or gender identity) or race or national origin (including hair texture and hairstyles that are commonly associated with race or national origin).

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of color, religion, sex (including sexual orientation, gender expression, or gender identity), handicap, familial status, or race or national origin (including hair texture and hairstyles that are commonly associated with race or national origin).

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of color, religion, sex (including sexual orientation, gender expression, and gender identity), or race or national origin (including hair texture and hairstyles that are commonly associated with race or national origin).

The enforcement provision is still being drafted but is expected to include a civil penalty of $500.

Hillsborough

Prohibits discrimination by an employer (i.e., any person employing 1+ persons within the town and anyone acting on such person’s behalf) on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin or ancestry, marital or familial status, pregnancy, veteran status, religious belief, age and disability.

n/a

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or

expression, national origin or ancestry, marital or familial status, pregnancy, veteran status, religious belief, age, and disability.

Violators are guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor under G.S. § 14-4(a) and will be fined $500.00 for each day discrimination occurs. Violators may also be subject to an enforcement action brought by the town under G.S. § 160A-175(d) and (e) for an appropriate equitable remedy, including, but not limited to, a mandatory or prohibitory injunction plus all other remedies available under state or federal.Orange Countyn/an/a

Prohibits discrimination because of age, race, ethnicity, color, national origin, religion, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, familial status, source of income, disability, political affiliation, veteran status, and disabled veteran status.

Violators are subject to enforcement under Sections 12-16 through 12-21, including investigation; referral to Office of Administrative Hearings, which may lead to injunctive relief, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and civil penalties; and judicial review and civil actions.

Related Articles

Rights and Wrongs


by Shannon Pierce

Antidiscrimination enforcement agencies, both federal and state, are likely going to be highly active in the next five years. Are Nevada businesses ready?

Faces of women overlapping in multi-color

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Discover The Best Lawyers in Spain 2025 Edition


by Jennifer Verta

Highlighting Spain’s leading legal professionals and rising talents.

Flags of Spain, representing Best Lawyers country

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa


by Jennifer Verta

Best Lawyers celebrates the finest in law, reaffirming its commitment to the global legal community.

Flags of Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa, representing Best Lawyers countries

How to Increase Your Online Visibility With a Legal Directory Profile


by Jennifer Verta

Maximize your firm’s reach with a legal directory profile.

Image of a legal directory profile

Paramount Hit With NY Class Action Lawsuit Over Mass Layoffs


by Gregory Sirico

Paramount Global faces a class action lawsuit for allegedly violating New York's WARN Act after laying off 300+ employees without proper notice in September.

Animated man in suit being erased with Paramount logo in background

The Future of Family Law: 3 Top Trends Driving the Field


by Gregory Sirico

How technology, mental health awareness and alternative dispute resolution are transforming family law to better support evolving family dynamics.

Animated child looking at staircase to beach scene

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

Safe Drinking Water Is the Law, First Nations Tell Canada in $1.1B Class Action


by Gregory Sirico

Canada's argument that it has "no legal obligation" to provide First Nations with clean drinking water has sparked a major human rights debate.

Individual drinking water in front of window

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

New Mass. Child Custody Bills Could Transform US Family Law


by Gregory Sirico

How new shared-parenting child custody bills may reshape family law in the state and set a national precedent.

Two children in a field holding hands with parents

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

Finding the Right Divorce Attorney


by Best Lawyers

Divorce proceedings are inherently a complex legal undertaking. Hiring the right divorce attorney can make all the difference in the outcome of any case.

Person at a computer holding a phone and pen

The Future of Canadian Law. Insights from Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch Honorees


by Jennifer Verta

Emerging leaders in Canada share their perspectives on the challenges and opportunities shaping the future of Canadian law

Digital eye with futuristic overlays, symbolizing legal innovation and technology

New Texas Law Opens Door for Non-Lawyers to Practice


by Gregory Sirico

Texas is at a critical turning point in addressing longstanding legal challenges. Could licensing paralegals to provide legal services to low-income and rural communities close the justice gap?

Animated figures walk up a steep hill with hand

Family Law Wrestles With Ethics as It Embraces Technology


by Michele M. Jochner

Generative AI is revolutionizing family law with far-reaching implications for the practice area.

Microchip above animated head with eyes closed